Individuals – Abrahamse et al. (1991)
Post-arrest case enhancement of repeat offenders increased odds of arrestees being incarcerated.
Individuals – Ariel et al. (2019)
Proactive engagement of prolific offenders led to lower offending in treated groups
Individuals – Bennett et al. (2018)
Truancy intervention led to a non-significant decrease in offending among treated students, despite control students experiencing a significant increase in offending over the same time period
Individuals – Berk et al. (1992)
Arrest of spousal abusers reduced recidivism
Individuals – Bonkiewicz et al. (2014)
Mental health post-crisis assistance program led to reductions in mental health calls for service, arrests, and emergency protective custody orders
Individuals – Casey et al. (2007)
Domestic violence victims receiving home visits have significantly less calls for service than comparison group
Individuals – Cho & Wilke (2010)
Arrest of intimate partner violence perpetrators associated with reduced victimization compared to non-arrest.
Individuals – Collins et al. (2017)
Diversion program for low-level offenders associated with significantly lower odds of a subsequent arrest and felony charge
Individuals – Dunford (1990)
Arrest warrant for domestic violence suspect reduced absent offender recidivism 50%
Individuals – Exum et al. (2014)
Suspects processed through the DV unit had significantly lower rates of re-offending
Individuals – Fox & Farrington (2015)
Behavioral profiles for burglary offenses and offenders increased arrest rates
Individuals – Fox et al. (2022)
Project Safe Neighborhoods led to reductions in violence and gun crime rates
Individuals – Goosey et al. (2017)
Domestic Abuse Service Coordination (DASC) Program led to a reduction in harm for treatment couples
Individuals – Greenspan et al. (2005)
Second Responder Program led to significant reductions in abusive acts
Individuals – Jolin et al. (1998)
Domestic violence unit designed to increase arrests and prosecutions of offenders and provide follow-up victim empowerment services associated with decline in victim-reported subsequent violence
Individuals – Knoxville P.D. (2002)
Police-probation collaborative program participants more likely to successfully complete probation
Individuals – Martin & Sherman (1986)
Targeted offenders in selective apprehension program more likely to be arrested, convicted, and incarcerated
Individuals – Messing et al. (2015)
A police-social service resulted in fewer victimization of physical violence.
Individuals – Mizrachi (2019)
Victims who received the Lethality Assessment Program (LAP) were less likely to experience future intimate partner violence
Individuals – Perrone et al. (2022)
Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program reduced misdemeanor and felony arrests, as well as felony cases
Individuals – Sherman & Berk (1984)
Arrest condition for domestic violence associated with significantly less offender recidivism compared to separation and mediation.
Individuals – Sherman et al. (2000) (Violent Offenders)
Restorative justice conferences can be effective in reducing repeat offending for violent offenders
Individuals – Spergel et al. (2002)
Comparison of 258 program juveniles with 96 comparison youth showed the program youth had arrest levels 18 percent lower than the comparison youth over a 4-year period.
Individuals – Thomas (1998)
Coordinated Agency Network (CAN) program reduced recidivism rates and increased successful completion of probation conditions
Individuals – White et al. (2021)
Madison Addiction Recovery Initiative (MARI) reduced recidivism among participants who completed the program
Individuals – Worrall & Gaines (2006)
Police/probation officer partnership for juvenile offenders associated with citywide reductions in assault, burglary, and theft arrests
Individuals – Esbensen (2002)
Students in Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program were less likely to join gangs in cross-sectional study. The longitudinal study, however, failed to find a programmatic effect.
Individuals – Esbensen et al. (2012)
Police-led programs for gang prevention aimed at reduction in gang membership, reduction in violent offending, and improved attitudes toward the police
Individuals – Goldstein et al. (2021)
Youth in a diversion program were significantly less likely to experience an arrest compared to control youth; Differences were not significant when comparing youth to a quasi-control matched group
Individuals – Harmon (1993)
Those that receive D.A.R.E. significantly less likely to start using alcohol in year after program; no impact on cigarette or marijuana use
Individuals – McCold & Wachtel (1998)
Violent offenders in restorative justice program have lower recidivism rates, but this is a selection effect, not a treatment effect; no difference among property offenders
Individuals – Pate & Hamilton (1992)
Arrest for domestic violence had a deterrent effect for employed offenders, but increased recidivism among unemployed offenders
Individuals – Ruiz (2021)
Domestic Violence Initiative (DVI) increased the likelihood of reporting repeat incidents but significantly reduced the average harm experienced during these incidents
Individuals – Shapland et al. (2008) (Northumbria – Adult Offenders)
Restorative justice conference had no effect on reconvictions for assault cases, but did lead to fewer reconvictions of property cases
Individuals – Sherman et al. (1992)
Arrest for domestic violence had deterrent effect for married, employed, white high school graduates, but was criminogenic for unemployed, unmarried, black high school drop outs
Individuals – Sherman et. al (1991)
Arrest for domestic violence had no effect on recidivism at six months, and short arrest increased recidivism after 12 months
Individuals – Wan et al. (2018)
The Safer Pathway program decreased domestic violence-related outcomes in some treatment locations but produced no effect or backfire effects in other locations
Individuals – Becker et al. (1992)
Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) had no significant impact on drug use
Individuals – Brame et al. (2015)
Court-imposed no-contact orders (NCOs) had no impact on victim safety or offender recidivism
Individuals – Brennan et al. (2018)
Early diversion program for low-risk female offenders did not significantly impact the probability of rearrest or the time to rearrest
Individuals – Broner et al. (2004)
Diversion program intended for adults with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse disorders did not significantly impact criminal recidivism
Individuals – Clayton et al. (1996)
No significant impact of D.A.R.E. on cigarette, alcohol, or marijuana use one year after and over five year follow up
Individuals – Davis & Taylor (1997)
Home visits after domestic violence failed to reduce repeat violence; Public education about domestic violence failed to reduce violence
Individuals – Davis et al. (2007)
No reduction in subsequent abuse for households that receive second responder within 24 hours or after 7 days
Individuals – Dunford (1992)
Arrest for domestic violence increased offense frequency at 12 months
Individuals – Ennett et al. (1994)
D.A.R.E. has no significant impact on smoking, alcohol use, or heavy drinking immediately after, 1 year after, and 2 years; after program
Individuals – Giblin (2002)
Juveniles participating in CAN (police/probation partnership) were more likely to have new technical violations than were juveniles on regular probation
Individuals – Hirschel et al. (1990)
Arrest for domestic violence increases official recidivism
Individuals – Koppensteiner et al. (2019)
Second Responder Program did not have a significant impact on the number of domestic violence incidents recorded by police
Individuals – Pate et al. (1992)
Follow-up visits by detectives for spousal assault did not reduce subsequent victim-reported offenses, threats, or property damage
Individuals – Perry et al. (2003)
D.A.R.E. has no significant impact on any of the outcome measures (self-reported tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use; violence, victimization)
Individuals – Ridgeway et al. (2011)
Letter to gun buyers informing them about gun laws has no impact on likelihood gun will become crime gun
Individuals – Ringwalt et al. (1991)
D.A.R.E has no significant impact on smoking, alcohol use, or use of inhalants
Individuals – Rose & Hamilton (1970)
Juvenile diversion and supervision program has no impact on juvenile recidivism
Individuals – Rosenbaum & Hanson (1998)
D.A.R.E has no significant overall impact on using drugs, cigarettes, or alcohol
Individuals – Saunders et al. (2016)
Predictive policing intervention targeting individuals at high risk for gun violence did not significantly impact the likelihood of becoming a shooting or homicide victim
Individuals – Shanahan et al. (2017)
Cautioning strategy for cannabis offenses had no significant impact on self-reported cannabis use
Individuals – Shapland et al. (2008) (London – Burglary)
Restorative justice conference had no effect on burglary offenders
Individuals – Shapland et al. (2008) (London – Robbery)
Restorative justice conference had no effect on robbery offenders
Individuals – Shapland et al. (2008) (Northumbria – Juveniles)
Restorative justice conference had no effect on juvenile offenders
Individuals – Sherman et al. (2000) (Juvenile Property Offenders)
Restorative justice conferences did not reduce offending of juvenile property offenders
Individuals – Sherman et al. (2000) (Juvenile Shoplifting Offenders)
Restorative justice conference had no effect for juvenile shoplifting offenders
Individuals – Small et al. (2019)
Removing firearms at the scene of IPV incidents was not significantly associated with subsequent IPV incidents
Individuals – Stover et al. (2009)
Domestic violence home-visit intervention (DVHVI) increased the likelihood of victims calling the police for subsequent incidents
Individuals – Stover et al. (2010)
Home visit program for domestic violence victims has no significant impact on reported violence
Individuals – Uchida & Swatt (2013) [Chronic Offender Component]
Targeting violent repeat offenders did not significantly reduce crime when implemented on its own.
Individuals – Williams-Taylor (2009)
Intensive supervision program for sex offenders has no significant impact on rates of general recidivism, sexual, violent, violent sexual or non-compliance recidivism
Individuals – Davis & Medina-Ariza (2001)
More elderly abuse incidents and calls to police reported in houses that receive home visit and education; those that receive home visits only call the police more, but don’t report more abuse
Individuals – Gottfredson et al. (2020)
Increase in school resource officers (SROs) led to an increase in drug and weapon-related offenses
Individuals – Hovell et al. (2006)
Those that receive Family Violence Response Team treatment have a 1.7 times greater rate of re-abuse
Individuals – Klein (1986)
More formal arrest processing increased recidivism
Individuals – Sherman et al. (2000) (Drunk Driving)
Restorative justice conference led to possible backfire effects (with caveats) in rehabilitating drunk drivers
Individuals – Sloboda et al. (2009)
Negative program effect for adolescent substance abuse prevention program on use of alcohol and cigarettes and no effect for marijuana use.
Individuals – Uchida et al. (2019)
Focused deterrence program led to quicker recidivism for treatment participants